From willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu Mon Jul 31 10:23:49 EDT 1995
Article: 35011 of rec.games.mecha
Path: gt-news!not-for-mail
From: willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu (Will Day)
Newsgroups: rec.games.mecha,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.mechwarrior2
Subject: Re: MW2 Joystick woes (was Re: MW2 comments and questions)
Date: 31 Jul 1995 10:23:43 -0400
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology, OIT Tech Support
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <3vip1f$2mo@rom.oit.gatech.edu>
References: <3v5ol0$83t@rom.oit.gatech.edu> <3v6pvr$btg@nnrp3.primenet.com> <3v85je$c68@rom.oit.gatech.edu> <3vhh6u$956@anshar.shadow.net>
Reply-To: willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: rom.oit.gatech.edu
Xref: gt-news rec.games.mecha:35011 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:108144 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic:96415
Status: RO

A short time ago, at a computer terminal far, far, away, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu (Will Day) wrote:
>>default - chassis L/R and torso U/D.  Whereas what I _want_ to do is
>>have the stick be torso L/R/U/D (non-centering!),
>
>I think what is really necessary is not to modify the joystick driver 
>to keep from autocentering, but to get a joystick that does not 
>autocenter. 

Well, I honestly have to say I think that's a lame suggestion. :)
Which would you say is easier: (a) modify the joystick code, or (b)
ask 5 million (or whatever - I've no idea) gamers to get new joysticks
that don't center?

I haven't seen a non-centering joystick in years, not since those
little Apple sticks they had for the Apple II.  And I never could
stand those. :)  Besides, I just don't see Thrustmaster coming out
with non-centering versions of all their sticks anytime soon, just to
get around a game that doesn't do their joystick code correctly.

>Making the game not respond to a joystick's physical 
>autocentering wouldn't work, IMO. Think about it. You push the stick 
>all the way up, and your torso tilts all the way down. Now, to tilt 
>all the way up, you must pull the stick back (to get to center), let 
>go, and pull the stick back again. That's no good.

Ah, but that's _exactly_ what I'm looking for.  That's what EarthSiege
did (one of the few things it did right).  That's what the VWE
BattleTech centers do.  That's the way it's done.

>> use the pedals for 
>>chassis L/R, and the throttle for, yes, the throttle.  Which is 
>>(those evil words:) like EarthSiege would do.  
>
>I don't like the way the game handles reversing. When I pull the 
>throttle all the way back, I'd like to be going full reverse. When I 
>push it all the way forward, I'd like to be going full forward. I 
>don't like having to press a key to reverse throttle.

I'm still undecided on which way I think is better.  EarthSiege did it
as you describe - 0 on the throttle is full reverse.  On the other
hand, VWE BattleTech centers do it like Mechwarrior II.  The thing
that I don't like about ES's method is that you have to be very very
precise with the stick in order to come to a complete halt.  I'd want
the throttle to have an indented position in an appropriate place 1/3 of
the way forward, in which it would rest for full-stop.  Somehow I don't
see the joystick manufacturers including that in their design unless
Mecha simulations begin approaching the popularity and commonality of
flight simulations.

>>>Starmate commands are indeed cumbersome.
>
>Agreed. Keystrokes to for basic commands to all mechs should be 
>available. Things like "build formation", "engage at will", "attack my 
>target", and "defend my target". Something like this shouldn't be too 
>hard to implement in a patch, should it?

I'd think not.  I'd also like to see a "Help me out" command,
although, I guess that's not very honorable. :)

>Braden

______________________________________________________________________________
Will Day       <PGP mail preferred>      OIT, Georgia Tech, Atlanta 30332-0715
willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu               http://rom.oit.gatech.edu/~willday/
     =-> Opinions expressed are mine alone and do not reflect OIT policy <-=
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
    Benjamin Franklin, Pennsylvania Assembly, Nov. 11, 1755


