From dank@alumni.caltech.edu Thu Sep 26 09:40:56 EDT 1996
Article: 18844 of alt.games.mechwarrior2
From: Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.games.mechwarrior2
Subject: Re: Mercinaries - quick REVIEW
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:35:34 -0700
Organization: Precious Little
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <3249FA06.47C1@alumni.caltech.edu>
References: <3249bd61.5009741@news.iserv.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-206-170-66-63.nhwd02.pacbell.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
To: Ron K <rojoyinc@iserv.net>
Path: news.accessus.net!chronos.syr.edu!coma.syr.edu!nntp.wwwi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!nntp-hub2.barrnet.net!news.PBI.net!usenet
Status: RO

Ron K wrote:
> 1. IMAGE ENHANCEMENT has been trashed.  This is the worst part.
> I always play mech2 and netmech in wireframe mode.  It's smoother
> during battles and I likek the hi-tech look.   Mercs offers NO
> WIREFRAME at all.

You can get it back by adding the line
ENHANCED_VISION                 w
into GAMEKEY.MAP.  It was taken out because it wasn't quite
finished- I think lasers don't show, or something like that.
(I bet we can finish that up for a patch sometime.)

> 4. The new slick graphics are un-useable.  I have a 166mhz pentium
> with 4 meg VRAM stealth and in order to get decent play speed I must
> disable ALL image maps.  (to get mech2 speed)  Even with these off, it
> still gets sluggish during the heat of battle. (I have only tried the
> win95 version, there is a DOS version on the disk as well... will try
> that next).  
My goodness, what graphics card do you have?  
That system should be just fine...
- Dan

-- 
The opinions expressed in this message are my own,
and are not the opinions of my employer.

Charles Darwin - a guy with a Vastly dangerous idea!


